<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man &gt; God &gt; Man and Infinity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mormondna.org/nature-of-god/man-god-man-infinity.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mormondna.org/nature-of-god/man-god-man-infinity.html</link>
	<description>What Mormons Are Really Made Of</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.mormondna.org/nature-of-god/man-god-man-infinity.html#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormondna.org/?p=20#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to point out, as a non-religious man, that claiming that that was a logical &quot;proof&quot; of the falsehood of mormonism is completely absurd and unscientific.  People throw the word &quot;proof&quot; around far too easily.  Finding a way in which it COULD not be true is not proof, because there are also ways it COULD be true, EVEN IF IT&#039;S LOGICALLY LESS LIKELY AND UNINTUITIVE.  The universe doesn&#039;t care what is intuitive to you or me.  There are countless ways for there to be an infinite regression with a limit being the &quot;beginning of time&quot;, or even a non-linear timeline.  Eastern philosophy has had many ideas about this for centuries.  (I personally do not believe there was a &quot;beginning of time&quot;.  THAT defies logic to me.)  Looking at Gods in this light make more sense in terms of entropy as well.  Spiritual entropy.  Crazy idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to point out, as a non-religious man, that claiming that that was a logical &#8220;proof&#8221; of the falsehood of mormonism is completely absurd and unscientific.  People throw the word &#8220;proof&#8221; around far too easily.  Finding a way in which it COULD not be true is not proof, because there are also ways it COULD be true, EVEN IF IT&#8217;S LOGICALLY LESS LIKELY AND UNINTUITIVE.  The universe doesn&#8217;t care what is intuitive to you or me.  There are countless ways for there to be an infinite regression with a limit being the &#8220;beginning of time&#8221;, or even a non-linear timeline.  Eastern philosophy has had many ideas about this for centuries.  (I personally do not believe there was a &#8220;beginning of time&#8221;.  THAT defies logic to me.)  Looking at Gods in this light make more sense in terms of entropy as well.  Spiritual entropy.  Crazy idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do Mormons believe they get their own planet after they die? &#124; Mormon DNA</title>
		<link>http://www.mormondna.org/nature-of-god/man-god-man-infinity.html#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Do Mormons believe they get their own planet after they die? &#124; Mormon DNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mormondna.org/?p=20#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] this brings up all sorts of logical and reasonable questions like &#8220;When did Gods begin then?&#8221; and &#8220;Is God the God of the entire universe or just part of it or are there other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this brings up all sorts of logical and reasonable questions like &#8220;When did Gods begin then?&#8221; and &#8220;Is God the God of the entire universe or just part of it or are there other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

